I think I should explain why I hate the Bourne Trilogy.
Mostly because I’ve had this discussion a lot lately and any time I do that I usually create a journal entry about it.
And this one’s bothered me for a year.
Because everyone has the opinion that the Bourne Trilogy of films is somehow good when, in reality, it’s a story that’s mostly about pissing around accomplishing little with really terrible camera work and one good fight scene.
In the first film.
The only good thing to come from those films is the fact that it allowed us to have Casino Royale. A much, much better spy film.
But if you want to truly understand why the Bourne films are just terrible you really, really need to know about the books.
So let me tell you.
